dventure, UNESCO distanced itself from the campaign. The UNESCO spokesman pointed out the lack of scientific expertise in the final step of the voting process. Indeed, the UNESCO World Heritage list is not the result of a democratic vote, but is decided by a college of scientists. That's why the New Seven Wonders of Nature list has to be considered as a private, non-scientific action, which can put forward different sites, especially those which are not in the UNESCO list.
lundi 7 novembre 2011
Differences with the UNESCO World Heritage list
Nonetheless, many voices rose against this program. First of all ; UNESCO. Even if a former director of the organisation is directly involved in the a
dventure, UNESCO distanced itself from the campaign. The UNESCO spokesman pointed out the lack of scientific expertise in the final step of the voting process. Indeed, the UNESCO World Heritage list is not the result of a democratic vote, but is decided by a college of scientists. That's why the New Seven Wonders of Nature list has to be considered as a private, non-scientific action, which can put forward different sites, especially those which are not in the UNESCO list.
dventure, UNESCO distanced itself from the campaign. The UNESCO spokesman pointed out the lack of scientific expertise in the final step of the voting process. Indeed, the UNESCO World Heritage list is not the result of a democratic vote, but is decided by a college of scientists. That's why the New Seven Wonders of Nature list has to be considered as a private, non-scientific action, which can put forward different sites, especially those which are not in the UNESCO list.
Inscription à :
Publier les commentaires (Atom)
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire